Trends and Innovations in Public Service: Impact Studies and Lessons Learned
Downloads
Background. Public service sectors globally are undergoing significant transformations driven by technological advancements, changing societal needs, and policy reforms. Understanding these trends and innovations is critical for improving service delivery and meeting the evolving expectations of the public. This research explores the impact of these changes and identifies lessons learned from recent public service innovations.
Purpose. The primary aim of this study is to analyze current trends and innovations in public service, evaluate their impact on service delivery, and derive key lessons that can inform future practice and policy. By examining these aspects, the research seeks to provide insights into how public services can be more responsive, efficient, and effective.
Method. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis with qualitative case studies. Quantitative data were collected through surveys of public service professionals and service users across various sectors. Qualitative data were gathered through in-depth interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders involved in public service innovation projects. The data were then analyzed to identify common themes and patterns.
Results. The findings reveal several key trends in public service, including the increased use of digital technologies, a focus on user-centric service design, and the adoption of collaborative governance models. These innovations have led to improvements in efficiency, accessibility, and user satisfaction. However, challenges such as digital divide, resistance to change, and resource constraints were also identified.
Conclusion. The study concludes that while innovations in public service have the potential to significantly enhance service delivery, their success depends on addressing underlying challenges. Effective implementation requires a holistic approach that includes stakeholder engagement, continuous capacity building, and adaptive policy frameworks. These lessons provide valuable guidance for public service organizations aiming to navigate and leverage the ongoing trends and innovations in their field.
Abookire, S. (2020). Health Design Thinking: An Innovative Approach in Public Health to Defining Problems and Finding Solutions. Frontiers in Public Health, 8(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00459
Abrams, J. (2019). The emergence of network governance in U.S. National Forest Administration: Causal factors and propositions for future research. Forest Policy and Economics, 106(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101977
Adeoye, O. (2019). Recommendations for the Establishment of Stroke Systems of Care: A 2019 Update: A Policy Statement from the American Stroke Association. Stroke, 50(7). https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000173
Alhasan, M. (2021). Digital imaging, technologies and artificial intelligence applications during COVID-19 pandemic. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 91(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101933
Alsaeedi, A. (2019). A study on sentiment analysis techniques of Twitter data. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(2), 361–374. https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2019.0100248
Amankwah-Amoah, J. (2019). Technological revolution, sustainability, and development in Africa: Overview, emerging issues, and challenges. Sustainable Development, 27(5), 910–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1950
Attaran, M. (2019). Blockchain-enabled technology: The emerging technology set to reshape and decentralise many industries. International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 12(4), 424–444. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJADS.2019.102642
Beidas, R. S. (2019). A repeated cross-sectional study of clinicians’ use of psychotherapy techniques during 5 years of a system-wide effort to implement evidence-based practices in Philadelphia. Implementation Science, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0912-4
Bosnic-Anticevich, S. (2019). ARIA pharmacy 2018 “Allergic rhinitis care pathways for community pharmacy”: AIRWAYS ICPs initiative (European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing, DG CONNECT and DG Santé) POLLAR (Impact of Air POLLution on Asthma and Rhinitis) GARD Demonstration project. Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 74(7), 1219–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13701
Bradley, S. W. (2021). Policy for innovative entrepreneurship: Institutions, interventions, and societal challenges. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 15(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1395
Canedo, J. R. (2019). Racial and ethnic differences in knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing in the US: Systematic review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 28(3), 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1078
Capolongo, S. (2020). COVID-19 and healthcare facilities: A decalogue of design strategies for resilient hospitals. Acta Biomedica, 91(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10117
Christidis, P. (2021). The post-pandemic recovery of transport activity: Emerging mobility patterns and repercussions on future evolution. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116359
Ciobanu, A. (2019). An integrated psycho-sociological perspective on public employees’ motivation and performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00036
Demircioglu, M. A. (2019). Public sector innovation: The effect of universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 596–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9636-2
Demircioglu, M. A. (2020). The effects of organizational and demographic context for innovation implementation in public organizations. Public Management Review, 22(12), 1852–1875. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1668467
Desmarchelier, B. (2020). Towards a servitization of innovation networks: A mapping. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1368–1397. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1637012
Fisk, M. (2020). Telehealth in the context of COVID-19: Changing perspectives in Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.2196/19264
Fukunaga, R. (2021). Epidemiology of Tuberculosis and Progress Toward Meeting Global Targets—Worldwide, 2019. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 70(12), 427–430. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7012a4
Galasso, E. (2019). Effects of nutritional supplementation and home visiting on growth and development in young children in Madagascar: A cluster-randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Global Health, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30317-1
Gieske, H. (2020). Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: Innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities. Public Management Review, 22(3), 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1588354
Haiyun, C. (2021). Analysis of the innovation strategies for green supply chain management in the energy industry using the QFD-based hybrid interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy decision approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 143(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110844
Hamidi, S. (2019). Does urban form matter for innovation productivity? A national multi-level study of the association between neighbourhood innovation capacity and urban sprawl. Urban Studies, 56(8), 1576–1594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018767002
Hansen, J. (2019). Climate Services Can Support African Farmers’ Context-Specific Adaptation Needs at Scale. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00021
Hirschhorn, F. (2019). Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 130(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12), 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.016
Jee, Y. (2020). WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committee for the COVID-19 outbreak. Epidemiology and Health, 42(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2020013
Kato, M., Saito, N., Matsushita, R., Ueno, M., Izawa, S., Maruyama, Y., Sugita, H., Ono, F., Muroi, R., Miyazaki, Y., Yamana, J., Peters, M. A., & Tesar, M. (2022). Philosophy of education in a new key: Voices from Japan. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(8), 1113–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1802819
Klein, N. (2020). Circular economy practices and strategies in public sector organizations: An integrative review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104181
Kosec, K. (2020). Can information improve rural governance and service delivery? World Development, 125(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.017
Kumar, R. (2021). Impacts of plastic pollution on ecosystem services, sustainable development goals, and need to focus on circular economy and policy interventions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179963
Kuo, C. C. (2019). Industrial revitalization via industry 4.0 – A comparative policy analysis among China, Germany and the USA. Global Transitions, 1(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2018.12.001
Kuziemski, M. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976
L?z?roiu, G. (2020). Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12052110
Lee-Geiller, S. (2019). Using government websites to enhance democratic E-governance: A conceptual model for evaluation. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.003
Lewis, S. J. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in medical imaging practice: Looking to the future. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences, 66(4), 292–295. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.369
Li, H. (2020). Does pollution-intensive industrial agglomeration increase residents’ health expenditure? Sustainable Cities and Society, 56(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102092
Liyanage, S. (2019). Flexible mobility on-demand: An environmental scan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051262
McBride, K. (2019). How does open government data driven co-creation occur? Six factors and a ‘perfect storm’; insights from Chicago’s food inspection forecasting model. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.11.006
Radicic, D. (2023). Impact of digitalization on technological innovations in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191(Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122474
Reddy, M. A. (2023). Social health protection during the COVID-pandemic using IoT. The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Digitalization of Diplomacy, Query date: 2024-06-05 09:04:12, 204–235. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8394-4.ch009
Zvolska, L. (2019). Urban sharing in smart cities: The cases of Berlin and London. Local Environment, 24(7), 628–645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1463978
Copyright (c) 2024 Tika Muzayanah, Surya Hidayat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
