EFFECTS OF SCAFFOLDING ON STUDENTS’ EXTRANEOUS COGNITIVE LOAD IN THE DEEP LEARNING APPROACH
Downloads
This study explores how scaffolding, when blended with a deep learning approach, can ease students’ extraneous cognitive load during junior high school science lessons. A quasi-experimental Nonequivalent Control Group Design was used because the research took place in real classroom settings, where random assignment was not possible. To reduce potential selection bias, both classes were matched based on prior science achievement and taught by the same teacher using comparable learning materials. A total of 62 seventh-grade students participated, with 31 in the experimental group and 31 in the control group. In the experimental class, scaffolding was implemented through step-by-step guidance, worked examples, prompts, and gradually reduced support as students progressed through deep learning activities such as exploring problems, connecting concepts, and reflecting on their thinking. Data were collected using an Extraneous Cognitive Load Questionnaire adapted from Paas, van Merriënboer, and Sweller (2021) and analyzed with an Independent Samples t-test. The findings revealed a significant difference between the two groups, t(60) = 9.03, p < .001, with the experimental class (M = 2.52) reporting a substantially lower cognitive load than the control class (M = 4.41). The 1.89-point decrease reflects a meaningful practical improvement, showing that students experienced less unnecessary mental effort while engaging with complex material. Overall, the study shows that combining scaffolding with deep learning strategies not only strengthens students’ understanding but also makes the learning process mentally more manageable, leading to a more effective and engaging science learning experience.
Ali, W., & Hamad, M. (2023). Adaptive e-scaffolding systems and student performance in hybrid learning. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100140.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100140
Appiah Twumasi, E. (2024). Scaffolding as a cognitive load reduction strategy for teaching atomic and nuclear physics. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v8i2.9580
Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2023). Metacognitive scaffolding for critical digital literacy in online learning environments. Computers & Education, 194, 104671.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104671
Bransen, D., et al. (2024). Scaffolding cognitive processing in complex learning tasks: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 36(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09841-8
Chang, C., & Wu, H. (2023). Guided experimentation with structured scaffolding to support conceptual change in physics learning. Research in Science Education, 53, 1109–1131.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10010-5
Chen, O., Kalyuga, S., & Sweller, J. (2023). Cognitive load effects in online multimedia learning environments: A review. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09676-x
Eitel, A., & Kienitz, C. (2024). Managing cognitive load in inquiry learning through adaptive guidance. Learning and Instruction, 86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstr.2023.101648
Hadwin, A., Panadero, E., & Miller, M. (2023). Socially shared regulation in collaborative learning: Current trends. Educational Psychologist, 58(2), 125–145.https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2180936
He, J., & Chen, Z. (2024). Enhancing higher-order thinking using layered scaffolding in digital PBL environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 589–603.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12832
Hidayat, R., & Pradana, M. (2023). Integrating ARCS motivational model in vocational e-learning to enhance student persistence. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(4), 127–140. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/jtet/article/view/13570
Hoogerheide, V., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. (2024). Cognitive load across instructional design models: A comparative synthesis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 22.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09852-7
Hülsmann, M., Richter, T., Köller, O., et al. (2024). Scaffolding and cognitive load in biology learning: An experimental study. Journal of Science Education, 52(3), 455–472.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10012-4
Jatmoko, D., Suyitno, S., Rasul, M. S., Nurtanto, M., Kholifah, N., & Masek, A. (2023). The Factors Influencing Digital Literacy Practice in Vocational Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(2), 1109-1121. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.2.1109 European Journal of Educational Research
Kim, N., & Lim, K. (2023). Guided tutoring in PBL settings: Effects on problem-solving performance and cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 84, 101605.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstr.2023.101605
Kirschner, P., & de Bruin, A. (2023). Effective guidance and scaffolding for SRL. Educational Psychology Review, 35, 411–434.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09670-3
Leppink, J. (2023). The role of cognitive load in inquiry-based and problem-based learning. Instructional Science, 51, 421–440.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09617-7
Lim, J., & Choi, H. (2024). AI-based scaffolding feedback in digital classrooms. Computers & Education, 205, 105043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105043
Martin, F., Chen, Y., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2023). Systematic review of online scaffolding in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 57, 100873.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100873
Mystakidis, S. (2023). Meaningful e-learning in immersive environments: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1445–1468.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11303-6
Ong, C. P., & Shahrill, M. (2023). Effects of guided instruction on student learning outcomes in science. Research in Science Education, 53, 155–172.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10050-x
Prastowo, T., & Wibowo, R. (2023). Student engagement and learning outcomes in vocational science classes supported by digital scaffolding. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 15(2), 88–102.https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/jtet
Rahmatullah, R., & Susanto, A. (2023). ARCS-based instructional model to enhance motivation and learning effectiveness in vocational education. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16310a
Reid, J., & Ayres, P. (2023). Cognitive architecture and its implications for instructional design in digital learning contexts. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71, 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10199-9
Rostaminezhad, M., & Behzadpoor, S. (2023). Reducing extraneous cognitive load through optimized multimedia design in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 455–468.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-10031-2
Sami, N., & Saleh, M. (2024). Digital scaffolding strategies to support inquiry-based STEM learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1887–1908.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11872-4
Setiawan, R., & Mahmud, S. (2024). Inquiry scaffolding to enhance conceptual mastery in biology laboratory activities. Education Sciences, 14(2), 98.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020098
Shao, J., Chen, Y., Wei, X., Li, X., & Li, Y. (2023). Effects of regulated learning scaffolding on regulation strategies and academic performance: A meta?analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1110086. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1110086
Singh, A., & Fong, L. (2024). Promoting deep learning using collaborative online learning models. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 401–420.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12810
Skulmowski, A., & Xu, K. (2023). Managing cognitive load in multimedia learning: New evidence. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107778.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107778
Suyitno, S., Jatmoko, D., Primartadi, A., & Ab-Latif, Z. (2023). Industrial practice platform based on work based learning: A solution to improve student competence. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 13(1), 98-106. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v13i1.54589
Tovar, M., & García, B. (2024). Digital scaffolding to enhance students’ complex problem-solving skills in blended learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(4), 552–569.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2123457
Van Nooijen, C., de Koning, B. B., & Bramer, W. (2024). Expert scaffolding in visual problem-solving tasks: Enhancing learning efficiency. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09848-3
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/mindinsocietydev0000vygo
Wang, S., & Adesope, O. (2023). Effects of adaptive scaffolding on students’ metacognition in digital learning environments: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 197, 104724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104724
Webb, M., & Blanchard, S. (2024). Scaffolding strategies in digital PBL classrooms: Implications for cognitive engagement. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(1), 133–149.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12781
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yen, C., & Tu, Y. (2023). Enhancing inquiry based science learning through dynamic scaffolding. Research in Science Education, 53, 1245–1262.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10020-3
Yusuf, M., & Subekti, H. (2023). The influence of guided project-based learning on vocational students’ performance and safety awareness. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1649a
Zhang, Z., & Chen, L. (2024). Tutor–student interaction and scaffolding effectiveness in online PBL. The Internet and Higher Education, 61, 100878.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2023.100878
Zuo, M. (2023). The effects of using scaffolding in online learning: A meta-analysis. Education Sciences, 13(7), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070705
Copyright (c) 2025 Eri Hasna Safira, Ismail Fikri Natadiwijaya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















