The Role of Influencers in Political Communication: Influence and Challenges of Collaboration with Public Figures
Article Sidebar
-
Political Communication, Influence and Challenges, Public Figures
Abstract
The phenomenon of influencers in political communication has undergone development in the digital era. The use of influencers as a medium to convey political messages not only changes the paradigm of traditional communication but also creates new dynamics in the interaction between the public and political figures. The involvement of influencers in political campaigns shows great potential in influencing public opinion. This research aims to examine the role of influencers in political communication, particularly in the context of their influence on public opinion and the challenges faced in collaboration between influencers and public figures or politicians. The main focus is to understand how influencers influence political decisions and the implications of using influencers in political communication strategies. This study uses qualitative methods with a case study approach. The results show that influencers play a crucial role in shaping political narratives and influencing public opinion. Their influence is particularly evident in raising awareness of political issues and mobilizing young voters. However, the study also reveals significant challenges, including credibility issues and potential information bias that can affect public trust in the political process. The study concludes that while using influencers in political communication offers new opportunities for public engagement, it also requires a careful approach to managing the associated risks and challenges. Political parties and candidates need to choose influencers who have a wide reach and high credibility and integrity to maintain public trust and enhance the effectiveness of political communication.
Full text article
References
Al Shehhi, K., & Almarri, K. (2022). Using a Hybrid Approach of Game Design, Blockchain Technology and Learning Analytics in Higher Education Institutions: A Case Study of the British University in Dubai. In M. Themistocleous & M. Papadaki (Eds.), Information Systems (Vol. 437, pp. 180–193). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_13
Ali, S. H., Foreman, J., Capasso, A., Jones, A. M., Tozan, Y., & DiClemente, R. J. (2020). Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: Methodology and feasibility analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01011-0
Becker, A. B. (2020). Applying mass communication frameworks to study humor’s impact: Advancing the study of political satire. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1794925
Boulianne, S. (2019). US Dominance of Research on Political Communication: A Meta-View. Political Communication, 36(4), 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670899
Bouquillion, P., & Ithurbide, C. (2022). Audio-visual industry and digital platforms in India: A contribution from political economy of communication. Global Media and Communication, 18(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665221125548
Carlson, T. N. (2019). Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 325–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541900008X
Carrasco Polaino, R., Villar Cirujano, E., & Tejedor Fuentes, L. (2018). Twitter como herramienta de comunicación política en el contexto del referéndum independentista catalán: Asociaciones ciudadanas frente a instituciones públicas. Revista ICONO14 Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes, 16(1), 64–85. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1134
Castro Seixas, E. (2021). War Metaphors in Political Communication on Covid-19. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 583680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.583680
Chowdhury, T. A., & Naheed, S. (2020). Word of mouth communication in political marketing: Understanding and managing referrals. Journal of Marketing Communications, 26(3), 290–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2018.1523217
Cladis, A. E. (2020). A shifting paradigm: An evaluation of the pervasive effects of digital technologies on language expression, creativity, critical thinking, political discourse, and interactive processes of human communications. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(5), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017752583
Dan, V., & Arendt, F. (2021). Visual Cues to the Hidden Agenda: Investigating the Effects of Ideology-Related Visual Subtle Backdrop Cues in Political Communication. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220936593
Djupe, P. A., & Neiheisel, J. R. (2022). The Religious Communication Approach and Political Behavior. Political Psychology, 43(S1), 165–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12848
Ekstrom, P. D., & Lai, C. K. (2021). The Selective Communication of Political Information. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(5), 789–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620942365
Elareshi, M., Habes, M., Ali, S., & Ziani, A. (2021). Using Online Platforms for Political Communication in Bahrain Election Campaigns. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.28
Esser, F. (2019). Advances in Comparative Political Communication Research through Contextualization and Cumulation of Evidence. Political Communication, 36(4), 680–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670904
Gesser-Edelsburg, A. (2021). Analysis of the Government of Israel’s COVID-19 Health and Risk Communication Efforts: Between a Political-Constitutional Crisis and a Health Crisis. In M. Lewis, E. Govender, & K. Holland (Eds.), Communicating COVID-19 (pp. 203–225). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79735-5_11
Goovaerts, I., & Marien, S. (2020). Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation: Decreasing Political Trust, Increasing Persuasive Power? Political Communication, 37(6), 768–788. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1753868
Goyanes, M., Demeter, M., Grané, A., Albarrán-Lozano, I., & Gil De Zúñiga, H. (2020). A mathematical approach to assess research diversity: Operationalization and applicability in communication sciences, political science, and beyond. Scientometrics, 125(3), 2299–2322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03680-6
Hatcher, W. (2020). A Failure of Political Communication Not a Failure of Bureaucracy: The Danger of Presidential Misinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic. The American Review of Public Administration, 50(6–7), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020941734
Häussler, T. (2021). Civil society, the media and the Internet: Changing roles and challenging authorities in digital political communication ecologies. Information, Communication & Society, 24(9), 1265–1282. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1697338
Jungblut, M., & Johnen, M. (2022). When Brands (Don’t) Take My Stance: The Ambiguous Effectiveness of Political Brand Communication. Communication Research, 49(8), 1092–1117. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211001622
Kang, Z., Indudhara, C., Mahorker, K., Bucy, E. P., & Joo, J. (2020). Understanding Political Communication Styles in Televised Debates via Body Movements. In A. Bartoli & A. Fusiello (Eds.), Computer Vision – ECCV 2020 Workshops (Vol. 12535, pp. 788–793). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66415-2_55
Katzenbach, C. (2021). “AI will fix this” – The Technical, Discursive, and Political Turn to AI in Governing Communication. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 205395172110461. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211046182
Knudsen, E., & Johannesson, M. P. (2019). Beyond the Limits of Survey Experiments: How Conjoint Designs Advance Causal Inference in Political Communication Research. Political Communication, 36(2), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1493009
Matalon, Y., Magdaci, O., Almozlino, A., & Yamin, D. (2021). Using sentiment analysis to predict opinion inversion in Tweets of political communication. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 7250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86510-w
Navarro, C., Moreno, A., Molleda, J. C., Khalil, N., & Verhoeven, P. (2020). The challenge of new gatekeepers for public relations. A comparative analysis of the role of social media influencers for European and Latin American professionals. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101881
Papakyriakopoulos, O., Serrano, J. C. M., & Hegelich, S. (2020). Political communication on social media: A tale of hyperactive users and bias in recommender systems. Online Social Networks and Media, 15, 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2019.100058
Peres, R., Talwar, S., Alter, L., Elhanan, M., & Friedmann, Y. (2020). Narrowband Influencers and Global Icons: Universality and Media Compatibility in the Communication Patterns of Political Leaders Worldwide. Journal of International Marketing, 28(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X19897893
Rodrigo-Martín, I., Muñoz-Sastre, D., & Rodrigo-Martín, L. (2022). Los influencers virtuales como líderes de opinión y su empleo en técnicas en comunicación política. Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, 13(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM.20751
Rojas, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2019). A Call to Contextualize Public Opinion-Based Research in Political Communication. Political Communication, 36(4), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670897
Sánchez-Villar, J.-M. (2019). The use of blogs as social media tools of political communication: Citizen journalism and public opinion 2.0. Communication & Society, 39–55. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.32.37812
Schürmann, L., & Stier, S. (2023). Who Represents the Constituency? Online Political Communication by Members of Parliament in the German Mixed?Member Electoral System. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 48(1), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12379
Sobieraj, S. (2019). Audiences in social context: Bridging the divides between political communications and social movements scholarship. Information, Communication & Society, 22(5), 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1568517
Tang, J. L. (2023). Issue Communication Network Dynamics in Connective Action: The Role of Non-Political Influencers and Regular Users. Social Media + Society, 9(2), 205630512311779. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231177921
Universidad de Cádiz (España), Marín Dueñas, P. P., Simancas González, E., Universidad de Cadiz (España), & Berzosa Moreno, A. (2019). Uso e influencia de Twitter en la comunicación política: El caso del Partido Popular y Podemos en las elecciones generales de 2016. Cuadernos.Info, 45, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.45.1595
Watkins, D. V., & Clevenger, A. D. (2021). US Political Leadership and Crisis Communication During COVID-19. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1901365. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1901365
Wojcieszak, M., Sobkowicz, P., Yu, X., & Bulat, B. (2022). What Information Drives Political Polarization? Comparing the Effects of In-group Praise, Out-group Derogation, and Evidence-based Communications on Polarization. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(2), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211004418
Zamora-Medina, R., Losada-Díaz, J.-C., & Vázquez-Sande, P. (2020). A taxonomy design for mobile applications in the Spanish political communication context. El Profesional de La Información, e290327. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.may.27
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Firdaus Yuni Dharta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
