Qualitative and Quantitative Study on Students’ Critical Thinking of Conceptual E-Scaffolding in Blended Learning Context
Downloads
Critical thinking ability is one of the rational thinking capabilities that is highly required by students in solving problems or delivering an idea. In fact, however, students’ critical thinking skill is still categorized as low according to the previous studies. One feasible alternative to be done in developing students’ critical thinking ability is implementing electronic-based scaffolding. For that reason, there should be research to examine conceptual e-scaffolding in blended learning on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) model to observe the first semester students’ critical thinking ability at IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. This study employed mixed-methods with explanatory research design. The experimental group was given conceptual e-scaffolding treatment in blended learning on Problem-Based Learning model and the control group did not receive any additional treatment. For both experimental and control groups, the research subject was the students in the first semester at IKIP Budi Utomo Malang. As there were two research groups, 46 students belonged to the control group. The instruments utilized in this research were pre-test and post-test. The pre-test consisted of 18 multiple choice items with reliability coefficient of 0.735 and critical thinking post-test consisted of 14 essay question items with reliability coefficient of 0.762. In addition, semi-structured interview and think aloud guidelines were used. Quantitative data were obtained from the distribution of pre-test and post-test items. Meanwhile, qualitative data were retrieved from semi-structured interview and think aloud. The quantitative data were then analyzed using ANACOVA parametric analysis while the qualitative data were analyzed using path analysis model. The research findings indicated that: 1) the critical thinking ability of students who studied with conceptual e-scaffolding in blended learning on Problem-Based Learning was higher than those who studied with conventional method, 2) the implementation of conceptual e-scaffolding in the form of link map in Problem-Based Learning model influenced positively towards students’ critical thinking ability. This was reflected from the behavior and the way of thinking of students belonged to the experimental group indicating critical thinking ability development during the learning process. Furthermore, conceptual e-scaffolding in the form of link map helped the students to obtain information easily and utilized it in understanding concepts in geometrical optic material.
Aguilar-Rodríguez, M., Marques-Sule, E., Serra-Añó, P., Espí-López, G. V., Dueñas-Moscardó, L., & Pérez-Alenda, S. (2019). A blended-learning programme regarding professional ethics in physiotherapy students. Nursing Ethics, 26(5), 1410–1423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733017748479
Aktepe, V., & Ulu, G. (2023). A Case Study of Research Skills of Primary School Students. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 23(33). https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.33.1672
Alwan, M. (2017). Pengembangan model blended learning menggunakan aplikasi Edmodo untuk mata pelajaran geografi SMA. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v4i1.10505
Anatoliivna, O. (2021). CRITICAL THINKING IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WORLD VUCA: ITS ROLE AND DEFINITION. ?????? ?????, 2–3, 382–387. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.02.04.2021.079
Baran, E., & AlZoubi, D. (2020). Affordances, challenges, and impact of open pedagogy: Examining students’ voices. Distance Education, 41(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1757409
Calderón, A., Scanlon, D., MacPhail, A., & Moody, B. (2021). An integrated blended learning approach for physical education teacher education programmes: Teacher educators’ and pre-service teachers’ experiences. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 26(6), 562–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2020.1823961
Chung, C.-J., Hwang, G.-J., & Lai, C.-L. (2019). A review of experimental mobile learning research in 2010–2016 based on the activity theory framework. Computers & Education, 129, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.010
Delle Monache, S., Comanducci, L., Buccoli, M., Zanoni, M., Sarti, A., Pietrocola, E., Berbenni, F., & Cospito, G. (2019). A Presence- and Performance-Driven Framework to Investigate Interactive Networked Music Learning Scenarios. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2019, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4593853
Erbil, D. G. (2020). A Review of Flipped Classroom and Cooperative Learning Method Within the Context of Vygotsky Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01157
Fan, Y., Saint, J., Singh, S., Jovanovic, J., & Gaševi?, D. (2021). A learning analytic approach to unveiling self-regulatory processes in learning tactics. LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448139.3448211
Gren, L. (2020). A Flipped Classroom Approach to Teaching Empirical Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(3), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2019.2960264
Kaplan-Rakowski, R. (2021). Addressing students’ emotional needs during the COVID-19 pandemic: A perspective on text versus video feedback in online environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09897-9
Kuru Gönen, S. ?. (2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: Reflections from pre-service teachers and students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 163–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1552974
Lapitan, L. Ds., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012
Marrhich, A., Lafram, I., Berbiche, N., & El Alami, J. (2020). A Khan Framework-Based Approach to Successful MOOCs Integration in the Academic Context. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(12), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i12.12929
Nieto, A. M., Saiz, C., & Philosophy Documentation Center. (2010). Critical Thinking: A Question of Aptitude and Attitude? Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 25(2), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews20102524
Olive, D. M., Huynh, D. Q., Reynolds, M., Dougiamas, M., & Wiese, D. (2019). A Quest for a One-Size-Fits-All Neural Network: Early Prediction of Students at Risk in Online Courses. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 12(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2019.2911068
Onah, D. F. O., Pang, E. L. L., Sinclair, J. E., & Uhomoibhi, J. (2021). An innovative MOOC platform: The implications of self-directed learning abilities to improve motivation in learning and to support self-regulation. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 38(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-03-2020-0040
Pérez-Pérez, M., Serrano-Bedia, A. M., & García-Piqueres, G. (2020). An analysis of factors affecting students´ perceptions of learning outcomes with Moodle. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(8), 1114–1129. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2019.1664730
Roman, T. A., Brantley-Dias, L., Dias, M., & Edwards, B. (2022). Addressing student engagement during COVID-19: Secondary STEM teachers attend to the affective dimension of learner needs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(sup1), S65–S93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1920519
Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165, 104132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132
Si?Ri?Pongdee, K., Pimdee, P., & Tuntiwongwanich, S. (2020). A blended learning model with IoT-based technology: Effectively used when the COVID-19 pandemic? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.698869
Valeeva, R., & Kalimullin, A. (2021). Adapting or Changing: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Teacher Education in Russia. Education Sciences, 11(8), 408. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080408
Vanslambrouck, S., Zhu, C., Pynoo, B., Thomas, V., Lombaerts, K., & Tondeur, J. (2019). An in-depth analysis of adult students in blended environments: Do they regulate their learning in an ‘old school’ way? Computers & Education, 128, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.008
Virani, S. R., Saini, J. R., & Sharma, S. (2023). Adoption of massive open online courses (MOOCs) for blended learning: The Indian educators’ perspective. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817760
Wood, J. (2021). A dialogic technology-mediated model of feedback uptake and literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(8), 1173–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1852174
Wulandari, I. A. P. F., Pujani, N. M., & Juniartina, P. P. (2019). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS SISWA. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), 2(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v2i2.19383
Zampirolli, F. A., Borovina Josko, J. M., Venero, M. L. F., Kobayashi, G., Fraga, F. J., Goya, D., & Savegnago, H. R. (2021). An experience of automated assessment in a large?scale introduction programming course. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(5), 1284–1299. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22385
Zhang, J.-H., Zou, L., Miao, J., Zhang, Y.-X., Hwang, G.-J., & Zhu, Y. (2020). An individualized intervention approach to improving university students’ learning performance and interactive behaviors in a blended learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1636078
Zinkevych, V. (2021). PEDAGOGICAL SCIENCE DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS IN THE DISCOURSE OF THE LIFE CYCLE OF THE INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION SYSTEM. Visnyk of the Lviv University Series Philosophical Sciences, 27, 72–78. https://doi.org/10.30970/PHS.2021.27.8
Copyright (c) 2024 Agusti Mardikaningsih

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















