TEACHER MOBILIZERS’ STRATEGIES IN ENHANCING STUDENTS’ CREATIVITY THROUGH THE INDEPENDENT TEACHING (MERDEKA MENGAJAR) PLATFORM AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS IN CLUSTER I, DEWANTARA DISTRICT, ACEH UTARA REGENCY
Downloads
This study aims to examine the strategies implemented by Leading Teachers to enhance student creativity through the use of the Merdeka Mengajar (PMM) Platform in three elementary schools in Cluster I, Dewantara District, North Aceh Regency. The research method used was descriptive qualitative, involving six leading teachers, three principals, and nine students as participants. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, then analyzed thematically. The results showed that Leading Teachers implemented various creative learning strategies, such as Project-Based Learning, Problem-Based Learning, differentiated learning, collaborative learning, and the use of interactive media and technology. To support these strategies, PMM was optimally utilized through features such as Teaching Modules, Inspirational Videos, Independent Training, and Evidence of Work for teacher professional development as well as contextual and innovative lesson planning and implementation. The synergy between learning strategies and the use of PMM had a significant positive impact on increasing student creativity, demonstrated through original work products, increased self-confidence, active discussion, and students' reflective and collaborative skills. This study recommends strengthening training and technical support to enable teachers to maximize the use of PMM as an innovative learning tool in elementary schools.
Alammar, K., Ahmad, M., Almutairi, S., & Salem, O. (2020). Nursing students’ perception of the clinical learning environment. Open Nursing Journal, 14(1), 174–179. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434602014010174
Baecher, L., Dalpino, M., da Silva, M. N., Gherardi, M., & Yamaguti, T. S. T. (2023). INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENT IN SUPERVISORS AS LEADERS OF LEARNING. European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 12(2), 103–120. Scopus.
Baker, M.-J., Cluett, E., Ireland, L., Reading, S., & Rourke, S. (2014). Supervising undergraduate research: A collective approach utilising groupwork and peer support. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 637–642. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.006
Brandon, J., Hollweck, T., Donlevy, J. K., & Whalen, C. (2018). Teacher supervision and evaluation challenges: Canadian perspectives on overall instructional leadership. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(3), 263–280. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2018.1425678
Burka, J. B., Sarnat, J. E., & St John, C. (2007). Learning from experience in case conference: A Bionian approach to teaching and consulting. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88(4), 981–1000. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1516/W766-4007-8205-5478
Cruz, M., Pinheiro, A., Medeiros, P., & Costa, J. (2022). PRIMARY ENGLISH PRACTICE PROGRAMME FOR AGES 6–7 PROJECT AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF TEACHER PROFESSIONALITY. Revista Brasileira de Educacao, 27. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782022270013
Darra, S., Sanges, P., & Wolfe, M. (2016). Minding the gap in midwifery supervision: Findings from the 2016 Welsh LSA audit. Evidence Based Midwifery, 14(4), 119–124. Scopus.
Derrington, M. L., & Kirk, J. (2017). Linking job-embedded professional development and mandated teacher evaluation: Teacher as learner. Professional Development in Education, 43(4), 630–644. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1231707
Deryakulu, D., & Olkun, S. (2009). Technology leadership and supervision: An analysis based on Turkish computer teachers’ professional memories. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 18(1), 45–58. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390802704055
Domakin, A. (2014). Are We Making the Most of Learning From the Practice Placement? Social Work Education, 33(6), 718–730. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2013.869315
Donaldson, M. L., & Woulfin, S. (2018). From Tinkering to Going “Rogue”: How Principals Use Agency When Enacting New Teacher Evaluation Systems. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 531–556. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718784205
Fareza, D., & Tentama, F. (2020). Testing of validity and reliability of the construction of job satisfaction in teachers of X elementary school in Tenggarong. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(1), 349–353. Scopus.
Ford, T. G., & Lavigne, A. L. (2024). Does It Matter Who Evaluates Teachers? Principal Versus Teacher-Led Evaluation and Teacher Motivation. Educational Policy, 38(4), 794–829. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959048221103796
Green, H. J. (2011). Skills training and self-esteem: Educational and clinical perspectives on giving feedback to clinical trainees. Behaviour Change, 28(2), 87–96. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.28.2.87
Groisman, M. (1972). Therapeutic community and education. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria, 21(1–2), 81–91. Scopus.
Hoekstra, A., & Korthagen, F. (2011). Teacher learning in a context of educational change: Informal learning versus systematically supported learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 76–92. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110382917
Hudson, R. (2006). All of humanity is here! Pastoral Care in Education, 24(2), 45–49. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0122.2006.00363.x
Jusslin, S., & Hilli, C. (2024). Supporting bachelor’s and master’s students’ thesis writing: A rhizoanalysis of academic writing workshops in hybrid learning spaces. Studies in Higher Education, 49(4), 712–729. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2250809
Kearney, W. S., Jurica, J., & Entzi, T. (2020). Near-peer video-based feedback: A useful activity for aspiring school leaders? International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 9(4), 357–373. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMCE-09-2019-0087
Kennedy, E.-K., & Laverick, L. (2019). Leading Inclusion in Complex Systems: Experiences of relational supervision for headteachers. Support for Learning, 34(4), 443–459. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12278
Lane, J., Shrotri, N., & Somani, B. K. (2024). Challenges and expectations of international medical graduates moving to the UK: An online survey. Scottish Medical Journal, 69(2), 53–58. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330241229922
Liberati, R., & Agbisit, M. (2017). Using Art-Based Strategies in Group-Based Counselor Supervision. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 12(1), 15–30. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2016.1189369
Marey, R., Hesham, G., Magd, A., & Toprak, M. (2020). Re-conceptualizing teacher evaluation and supervision in the light of educational reforms in Egypt. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 2(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100081
Moran, A. M., Coyle, J., Pope, R., Boxall, D., Nancarrow, S. A., & Young, J. (2014). Supervision, support and mentoring interventions for health practitioners in rural and remote contexts: An integrative review and thematic synthesis of the literature to identify mechanisms for successful outcomes. Human Resources for Health, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-12-10
Nawi, M. A., Jamsari, E. A., Sulaiman, A., & Hamzah, M. I. (2013). Development and evaluation of ning social network for teaching training online surveillance. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 14(1), 245–255. Scopus.
Oghuvbu, E. P. (2011). Implementation of the primary school curriculum modules in Nigeria: The role of supervision. Anthropologist, 13(2), 147–150. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/09720073.2011.11891190
Paufler, N. A., King, K. M., & Zhu, P. (2020). Promoting professional growth in new teacher evaluation systems: Practitioners’ lived experiences in changing policy contexts. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100873
Ragsdale, J. R., Orme-Rogers, C., Bush, J. C., Stowman, S. L., & Seeger, R. W. (2016). Behavioral Outcomes of Supervisory Education in the Association for Clinical Pastoral Education: A Qualitative Research Study. Journal of Pastoral Care and Counseling, 70(1), 5–15. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542305015619885
Rankine, M. (2019). The ‘thinking aloud’ process: A way forward in social work supervision. Reflective Practice, 20(1), 97–110. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2018.1564651
Russell, T. (2017). Improving the Quality of Practicum Learning: Self-Study of a Faculty Member’s Role in Practicum Supervision. Studying Teacher Education, 13(2), 193–209. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425964.2017.1342358
Scheeres, K., Agrawal, N., Ewen, S., & Hall, I. (2022). Transforming MRCPsych theory examinations: Digitisation and very short answer questions (VSAQs). BJPsych Bulletin, 46(1), 52–56. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2021.23
Siagian, N., Amin, H., & Munawati, S. (2025). School Principal Supervision and Teacher Professionalism: A Study on Leadership in Islamic Schools. Munaddhomah, 6(2), 223–227. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v6i2.1765
Strandell-Laine, C., Salminen, L., Blöndal, K., Fuster-Linares, P., Hourican, S., Koskinen, S., Leino-Kilpi, H., Löyttyniemi, E., Stubner, J., Truš, M., & Suikkala, A. (2022). The nurse teacher’s pedagogical cooperation with students, the clinical learning environment and supervision in clinical practicum: A European cross-sectional study of graduating nursing students. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03445-0
Sundler Johansson, A. J., Björk, M., Bisholt, B., Ohlsson, U., Engström, A. K., & Gustafsson, M. (2014). Student nurses’ experiences of the clinical learning environment in relation to the organization of supervision: A questionnaire survey. Nurse Education Today, 34(4), 661–666. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.06.023
Tistad, M., Bergström, A., Elf, M., Eriksson, L., Gustavsson, C., Göras, C., Harvey, G., Källberg, A.-S., Rudman, A., Unbeck, M., & Wallin, L. (2023). Training and support for the role of facilitator in implementation of innovations in health and community care: A scoping review protocol. Systematic Reviews, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02172-x
West, M. (2021). ‘I’m Not Going to Tell You Cos You Need to Think About This’: A Conversation Analysis Study of Managing Advice Resistance and Supporting Autonomy in Undergraduate Supervision. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(1), 198–222. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00194-5
Copyright (c) 2025 idarwati, Mukhlisuddin, Alfi Syahrin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
