AI, BIAS, AND EQUITY IN EDUCATION: ADDRESSING CHALLENGES IN ALGORITHMIC DECISION MAKING
Downloads
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into educational systems through predictive analytics, automated assessments, learning management platforms, admissions processes, and student support services. Growing reliance on algorithmic decision-making technologies has created opportunities to improve efficiency, consistency, and scalability in educational administration and instruction. Concerns regarding algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, and educational equity have simultaneously emerged as critical challenges, particularly when AI systems are trained on historical data that may reflect existing social and institutional inequalities. This study aims to examine the relationships among AI implementation, algorithmic bias, transparency, accountability, trust, and educational equity in educational decision-making contexts. A mixed-methods convergent design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 480 participants, including students, teachers, administrators, policymakers, and educational technology specialists. Qualitative interviews were conducted to explore stakeholder experiences and perceptions regarding algorithmic fairness and governance. Structural Equation Modeling and thematic analysis were used to analyze the data. Findings revealed that transparency significantly enhanced trust in AI systems, while accountability positively influenced perceptions of educational equity. Perceived algorithmic bias demonstrated a strong negative effect on fairness and trust. Qualitative evidence further indicated that inadequate oversight and biased datasets may contribute to unequal educational outcomes. The study concludes that equitable AI implementation requires transparent governance, accountability mechanisms, continuous bias auditing, and meaningful human oversight to ensure that algorithmic decision-making supports educational justice rather than reinforcing existing inequalities.
Aburub, F., Hadi, W., Abdel-Rahem, R. A., & Al-Remawi, M. (2026). Faculty Perceptions of AI Challenges at the University of Petra. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 25(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649225500662
Ali, U., Hanif, S., Jabeen, F., Shaheen, M. N. U. K., Imran, A., Zaman, S., Anaç, A. S., & Alici, ?. (2026). Ethical Management of Artificial Intelligence in Special Education: Balancing Innovation and Inclusion. International Journal of Special Education, 41(2S), 219–233. Scopus.
Al-Naser, Y., Sharma, S., Niure, K., Ibach, K., & Yong-Hing, C. J. (2026). Radiology Synthetic Confusion: How Generative Artificial Intelligence Amplifies Misunderstandings of Radiologists and Technologists in Patient-Facing Media. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal, 77(1), 98–106. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371251350085
Anthis, Z., & Kyriakidou-Zacharoudiou, A. (2026). Face value: How avatar identity shapes epistemic trust in AI-mediated learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100610
Arya, S., & Lin, W. (2026). Non-linear model-based sequential decision-making in agriculture. Environmental Research Communications, 8(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae489e
Babker, A. M. (2026). Clinical Safety and Legal Accountability of Artificial Intelligence in Hematology Diagnostic Laboratories: Risks, Failure Modes, Medicolegal Challenges, and Budgeting for Implementation. Journal of Applied Hematology, 17(2), 85–92. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4103/joah.joah_33_26
Balarabe, K. (2026). Algorithmic authoritarianism: Artificial intelligence’s threat to privacy and freedom in the global south. Information and Communications Technology Law, 35(2), 201–233. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2025.2541124
Balsano, C., Cabitza, F., Cicco, S., Gori, M., Malerba, D., Montagna, M., Tarquini, R., & Vacca, A. (2026). Artificial intelligence in medicine: A position paper by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 21(1), 1–14. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04146-4
Bergström, L. H. (2026). Ethical Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Automation. Cineforum, 66(2), 340–344. Scopus.
Bougriche, Z., Osuchowski, J., D?bro?, M., & Tomaszewski, M. (2026). Human and AI Perspectives: Comparing Emotion Recognition from Facial Expressions and Hand Gestures. Cognitive Computation, 18(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-026-10618-2
Ceallaigh, T. J. Ó., & Murphy, S. (2026). Teaching the teachers: A systematic review of genAI-specific technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK) in teacher education. Computers and Education Open, 10. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100367
Cecchi, R., Calabrò, F., Camatti, J., Santunione, A. L., Sperti, M., Zizzi, E. A., & Deriu, M. A. (2026). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Proposal for a new medico-legal methodology in medical liability. Legal Medicine, 80. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102764
Certo, L., Alves, M., & Magalhães, T. (2026). The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Public Health Surveillance in Portugal: An Exploratory Study of Expert Perspectives. Portuguese Journal of Public Health, 1–20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1159/000550578
Chen, L., Zhou, J., Yao, N., Xi, H., Zhang, J., Cen, Z., Li, J., Song, Z., Li, P., Gu, Z., Baklanov, A., Christensen, J. H., Coll, I., Sahyoun, M., & Yu, S. (2026). Integrating the smart-city-brain framework for carbon neutrality, resilient and sustainable cities. Journal of Urban Management. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2026.04.001
Choi, A. E., Chung, M. E., & Sun, L. Y. (2026). Unmasking bias in artificial intelligence: Sex and racial representation in critical care medicine through text-to-image generators. BJA Open, 19. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100562
Chu, W. W., & Lam, J. L. C. (2026). Transforming healthcare management: The impact of artificial intelligence on leadership and operations. Management in Healthcare, 10(3), 253–265. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.69554/AQMU2524
Coleman, O. F., & Waterfield, D. A. (2026). Ethical AI Use in IEP Development: A Guiding Framework. Journal of Special Education Technology. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434261419099
De Gagne, J. C., Carrejo, D. J., & Hwang, H. (2026). Generative AI Ethics Toolkit for Clinical Prioritization in Nursing Education. Nursing Ethics, 33(4), 1169–1180. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330261428627
del Rey Puech, P., Payne, R., Saund, J., & McKee, M. (2026). Mind the (widening) gap: Why public health must engage with AI now. Public Health, 250. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.106047
Difonzo, F., Holst, M., Kimiaei, M., Kungurtsev, V., & Qiu, S. (2026). Towards real time control of water engineering with nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Science, 100. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2026.102945
Dixit, M. K., & Shanbhag, S. S. (2026). The evolution of inverse optimization: A cross-disciplinary review of algorithmic approaches and application framework in building life cycle assessment. Energy and Buildings, 368. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.117827
Emma, O. (2026). Extended reality in the digital age: A literature review on technology-driven learning environments. Computers and Education: X Reality, 8. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2025.100127
Gimenez Lynch, C., & Thaller, S. (2026). Global Disparities and Artificial Intelligence in Plastic Surgery: A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Ethical Implications. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 37(3/4), 787–790. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000012054
Gules-Guctas, E. (2026). How Do Algorithmic Decision-Making Systems Used in Public Benefits Determinations Fail? Insights From Legal Challenges. Public Administration Review, 86(2), 371–382. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70043
Hoffarth, M. (2026). Reimagining critical thinking in the age of AI: Implications for nursing education and practice. Nurse Education Today, 162. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107076
Kladko, S., Lavazza, A., Yu, X., & Farina, M. (2026). From guidelines to practice: Navigating ethical and cultural challenges in operationalizing AI for project management. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 10(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2026.100181
Kong, K., Liu, Z., Gao, Z., Dong, H., & Isleem, H. F. (2026). Hierarchical deep reinforcement learning for real-time tactical decision-making in team sports. Data Technologies and Applications, 60(2), 221–256. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-06-2025-0512
Kyambade, M., & Namatovu, A. (2026). Exploring HR Professionals’ Experiences with Generative AI in Recruitment: A Phenomenological Study in Public Hospitals in Uganda. SAGE Open, 16(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440261457060
Liu, R., & Glave, C. Z. (2026). Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Artificial Intelligence and Childhood Education: A Critical Systematic Review. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 40(1), 5–23. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2025.2578526
Madle?ák, R., Madle?áková, L., Cvacho, V., & Gachulinec, D. (2026). Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Four-Pillar Student-Activity Framework for Institutional Governance. Education Sciences, 16(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16040555
Mariyono, D., Yunus, M., Junaidi, J., Syam, N., & Mazhabi, Z. (2026). Educational leadership in the digital era: Bridging global disparities with inclusive management strategies. Educational Management Administration and Leadership. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432261419475
Massouti, A., Baroudi, S., & Shaya, N. (2026). Exploring AI integration in United Arab Emirates’ teacher education programmes: The voice of educators leading the change. Cambridge Journal of Education, 56(3), 383–401. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2026.2651759
McConvey, K., Ghai, M., Lee, R., & Guha, S. (2026). Risk, Retention, and the Algorithmic Institution: Artificial Intelligence as a Policy Response to Higher Education in Crisis. Canadian Public Policy, 52(S1), 156–169. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2025-030
Mo, F., Yang, Y., & Olenchak, F. R. R. (2026). Navigating the Human-AI Partnership in the Undergraduate Creative Process: A Qualitative Inquiry. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-026-09966-7
Molu, B. (2026). Nursing students’ perceptions of gender and race in AI healthcare imagery. Nursing Ethics, 33(3), 813–830. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251403134
Muro, A. V. (2026). Theoretical pedagogical model for the integration of AI and ALFIN in the training of normal school teachers. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecologia, 49(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rib.v49n2e362266
Osebor, I. M., & Amaechi, E. (2026). THE ETHICAL ROLE OF NATIVE-CENTRIC ALGORITHM DECOLONIZING ALGORITHMIC BIAS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics, (17), 235–253. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.60940/rljae17Id980000016860
Pigac, T. (2026). Transparency in large language model (LLM)-powered digital human twins: The AI ethics perspective. AI and Society, 41(3), 2109–2118. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02617-y
Qiu, M., Wu, Y., Zeng, L., & Zhang, F. (2026). Ethical considerations of AI integration in palliative care: A qualitative study. BMC Palliative Care, 25(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02059-3
Radu, T.-A., Radu, C.-C., Pertz, C.-M., & Pa?can, E. M. (2026). ETHICAL ASPECTS IN DENTISTRY: FROM CONVENTIONAL PRACTICE TO THE DIGITAL ERA. Romanian Journal of Legal Medicine, 34(2), 113–119. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.4323/rjlm.2026.113
Rahmatullah, T., & Nozlan, N. N. (2026). Exploring AI Integration in Financial Institutions: Challenges, Compliance, and Quality Assurance’s Role in Security. Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions, 5(1), 175–204. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21098/jcli.v5i1.445
Reddy, Y. J., Kurt, H., Tiwari, A., Kaur, U., Gautam Lade, S., & Waghmare, V. (2026). Optimization of IOT-Based Energy Management Systems Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Smart Buildings. International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology, 16(12), 721–729. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.25258/ijddt.16.12s.86
Sanusi, S., Rusnawati, R., Pelas, M. U., Halik, H., & Maksum, H. (2026). Sociology of citizenship and AI ethics: Reshaping higher education amid technological disruption, a conceptual study. Qualitative Research Journal, 1–20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-09-2024-0219
Saroughi, M., & Nozari, H. (2026). Quantify uncertainty of meta-heuristic algorithms in optimal reservoir operation. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research, 64. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.2026.100696
Sassenberg, A.-M., Acharya, N., Kar, P., & Eshaghi, M. S. (2026). Beyond Accuracy: The Cognitive Economy of Trust and Absorption in the Adoption of AI-Generated Forecasts. Forecasting, 8(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast8010008
Schilhabel, S. A., Sankaranarayanan, B., Subedi, M., & Muraski, J. (2026). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on psychological well-being and inclusivity in higher education. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 1–17. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-09-2025-0238
Shal, T., Ghamrawi, N., Ghamrawi, N. A. R., Abu-Tineh, A. M., & Alshaboul, Y. M. (2026). Mobile Professional Development for STEM Teachers Using AI. Computers in the Schools. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2026.2622712
Solano, C., Tarazona, N., Pietropaolo, A., Somani, B., & Traxer, O. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence in the daily urology unit: A practical, patient-centered framework. Journal of Clinical Urology, 19(4), 404–410. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158261445149
Sopiyan, M., Judijanto, L., Asad, M., Zuhri, S., & Syufa’at, S. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Family Law: Addressing Ethical and Regulatory Gaps through a Maq??id al-Shar?‘ah Approach. Mawaddah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 4(1), 1–18. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.52496/mjhki.v4i1.31
Sullivan, A., Geis, G., & Cummings, C. (2026). Ethics Education in Neonatology: Integrating Theory, Multimodal Methods, and AI Innovation. NeoReviews, 27(2), e73–e83. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1542/neo.27-2-099
Tella, A., & Olatoye, A. A. (2026). Artificial intelligence-driven gamification in smart libraries for redefining user engagement in the library of the future. Library Hi Tech News, 43(5), 4–8. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-04-2026-0095
Tian, L., Wu, W., Tan, Y., & Feng, S. (2026). Self-reported AI literacy and gendered self-efficacy: Evidence from Chinese adolescents. Telecommunications Policy, 50(4). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2026.103152
Uchoa, A. P., Oliveira, C. E. T., Motta, C. L. R., & Schneider, D. (2026). Natural-Language Mediation Versus Numerical Aggregation in Multi-Stakeholder AI Governance: Capability Boundaries and Architectural Requirements. Computers, 15(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers15010024
Wright, G. W., Diaz, B., & von Gillern, S. (2026). Science Educators’ Attitudes and Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence (SEAP-AI) Scale. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-026-10302-y
Yadav, A. B. (2026). Strengthening consumer consent in e-commerce: Legal and policy reforms to address dark patterns and AI-driven challenges. Journal of Data Protection and Privacy, 8(3), 254–271. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.69554/MYRT2092
Zhai, X. (2026). What a party knows: Rethinking knowledge assessment in automated contracting. Computer Law and Security Review, 61. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2026.106336
Copyright (c) 2026 Yayu Laode, A. Asdar, Najamuddin Petta Solong

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















