Designing Culturally Responsive Language Curricula
Downloads
Language curricula often fail to address the diverse cultural backgrounds of learners, which can impact engagement and the effectiveness of language acquisition. In multicultural learning environments, culturally responsive curricula are essential to creating inclusive education that respects and integrates learners’ unique cultural experiences. This research aims to explore the design and implementation of culturally responsive language curricula that enhance learner engagement and improve language proficiency by aligning educational content with students’ cultural contexts. A qualitative research approach was employed, involving case studies of five educational institutions with diverse student populations. Data were collected through interviews with educators, curriculum developers, and students, as well as through analysis of existing curricula. The study examined how culturally relevant content and teaching methods were incorporated into language courses and evaluated their impact on student motivation, participation, and proficiency. The analysis also identified key strategies for designing culturally responsive curricula. The results indicated that integrating learners’ cultural backgrounds into the curriculum significantly improved engagement and language proficiency. Educators reported higher levels of student participation and motivation when the content reflected learners’ cultural identities and real-life experiences. Additionally, students showed greater retention of language skills when cultural relevance was emphasized in the learning process.
Adesina, J. A., Piketh, S. J., Qhekwana, M., Burger, R., Language, B., & Mkhatshwa, G. (2020). Contrasting indoor and ambient particulate matter concentrations and thermal comfort in coal and non-coal burning households at South Africa Highveld. Science of The Total Environment, 699, 134403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134403
Aitieva, D., Kim, S., & Kudaibergenov, M. (2024). Russian “relocants” share their experiences: A study of perceptions of Kyrgyzstan as a destination. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100930
Arakawa, K., Mori, K., Ikeda, K., Matsuzaki, T., Kobayashi, Y., & Tomita, M. (2003). G-language Genome Analysis Environment: A workbench for nucleotide sequence data mining. Bioinformatics, 19(2), 305–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/19.2.305
Arakawa, K., Yamada, Y., Shinoda, K., Nakayama, Y., & Tomita, M. (2006). GEM System: Automatic prototyping of cell-wide metabolic pathway models from genomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(1), 168. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-168
Belelie, M. D., Havenga, H., Klopper, D., Garland, R. M., Language, B., Formenti, P., Namwoonde, A., Burger, R. P., & Piketh, S. J. (2023). Variability of ambient particulate matter loading at Henties Bay, Namibia. Clean Air Journal, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/caj/2023/33/2.16670
Bleses, D., Vach, W., Slott, M., Wehberg, S., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. O., & Basbøll, H. (2008). Early vocabulary development in Danish and other languages: A CDI-based comparison. Journal of Child Language, 35(3), 619–650. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000908008714
Boeriis, M., & Holsanova, J. (2012). Tracking visual segmentation: Connecting semiotic and cognitive perspectives. Visual Communication, 11(3), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357212446408
Cadierno, T., & Robinson, P. (2009). Language typology, task complexity and the development of L2 lexicalization patterns for describing motion events. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 7, 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.7.10cad
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006). Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 183–216. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.4.08cad
Dale, R. (2019a). Five Tips for a Successful API. Natural Language Engineering, 25(06), 769–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324919000536
Dale, R. (2019b). Law and Word Order: NLP in Legal Tech. Natural Language Engineering, 25(1), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324918000475
Dale, R. (2020). Natural language generation: The commercial state of the art in 2020. Natural Language Engineering, 26(4), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1017/S135132492000025X
Dale, R. (2021). GPT-3: What’s it good for? Natural Language Engineering, 27(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324920000601
Dale, R. (2024a). A year’s a long time in generative AI. Natural Language Engineering, 30(1), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324923000554
Dale, R. (2024b). Start-up activity in the LLM ecosystem. Natural Language Engineering, 30(3), 650–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324924000032
Dale, R., & Viethen, J. (2021). The automated writing assistance landscape in 2021. Natural Language Engineering, 27(4), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324921000164
Gopalakrishnan, P., Tiwari, S., Nagaraja, R., & Krishnan, G. (2024). Quality of life in persons with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 18, e20230093. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5764-dn-2023-0093
Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.001
Havenga, H., Gharbi, D., Sewry, N., Language, B., Neumann, F. H., Finch, J. M., Hill, T., Boulter, J., Jordaan, E., Piketh, S. J., Schwellnus, M., & Burger, R. P. (2024). Healthy environments for athleTes (HEAT): Environmental conditions along a 90 km ultra-marathon event, South Africa. International Journal of Biometeorology, 68(9), 1757–1771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-024-02703-8
Jensen, A. (2009). Discourse strategies in professional e-mail negotiation: A case study. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.10.002
Ladegaard, H. J. (1998). National stereotypes and language attitudes: The perception of British, American and Australian language and culture in Denmark. Language & Communication, 18(4), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(98)00008-1
Ladegaard, H. J., & Bleses, D. (2003). Gender differences in young children’s speech: The acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00045
Lynch, B. K., & McNamara, T. F. (1998). Using G-theory and Many-facet Rasch measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants. Language Testing, 15(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500202
Marchetti, G. (2006). A presentation of Attentional Semantics. Cognitive Processing, 7(3), 163–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-006-0144-9
Marchetti, G. (2014). Attention and working memory: Two basic mechanisms for constructing temporal experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00880
Marchetti, G. (2018). Consciousness: A unique way of processing information. Cognitive Processing, 19(3), 435–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-018-0855-8
Mey, J. L. (2003). Context and (dis)ambiguity: A pragmatic view. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(3), 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00139-X
Mey, J. L. (2005). On Marking Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(8), 1141–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.04.004
Mukwevho, P., Burger, R., Piketh, S., Jacobs, N., Language, B., Havenga, H., & Düring, D. (2023). Imagining an air quality framework that works: How do we mainstream offsets? Clean Air Journal, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.17159/caj/2023/33/2.17252
Nørgaard, N. (2009). The Semiotics of Typography in Literary Texts. A Multimodal Approach. Orbis Litterarum, 64(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0730.2008.00949.x
Pedersen, S. B. (2012). Interactivity in health care: Bodies, values and dynamics. Language Sciences, 34(5), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.009
Rasmussen, R. K., & Merkelsen, H. (2012). The new PR of states: How nation branding practices affect the security function of public diplomacy. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 810–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.06.007
Steffensen, S. V. (2009). Language, languaging, and the Extended Mind Hypothesis. Pragmatics & Cognition, 17(3), 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.3.10ste
Steffensen, S. V. (2012). Care and conversing in dialogical systems. Language Sciences, 34(5), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.03.008
Storch, N. (1999). Are two heads better than one? Pair work and grammatical accuracy. System, 27(3), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00031-7
Storch, N. (2001). How collaborative is pair work? ESL tertiary students composing in pairs. Language Teaching Research, 5(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880100500103
Storch, N., & Tapper, J. (2000). The Focus of Teacher and Student Concerns in Discipline-Specific Writing by University Students. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/758484345
Tylén, K., Wallentin, M., & Roepstorff, A. (2009). Say it with flowers! An fMRI study of object mediated communication. Brain and Language, 108(3), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.07.002
van Zyl, P. (2021). Segakweng et al 2021 dataset.xlsx (p. 57621 Bytes) [Dataset]. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.17197247.V1
Wehberg, S., Vach, W., Bleses, D., Thomsen, P., Madsen, T. O., & Basbøll, H. (2007). Danish children’s first words: Analysing longitudinal data based on monthly CDI parental reports. First Language, 27(4), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723707081723
Copyright (c) 2024 Mas’ud Muhammadiah, Nong Chai, Chai Pao
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
