The Analyst of Interactive Lecturing Approach to Enhance the Students’ Learning Motivation in Higher Education Institutions
Downloads
Lectures can range from being fully focused on the teacher to valuing learner-teacher and learner-learner interaction. Advocates of the completely didactic (teacher-cantered) lecture want to maximize the amount of lecture time available for material delivery, viewing other activities as 'lost' lecture time. However, educational research has found the potential benefit of interactivity in promoting cognitively active learning and better learning outcomes. This study aim is to find out the interactive lecture approach to drive of students learning motivation in higher education. The research was the qualitative research approach. The data was found from library research. The results are the strategies for interactive lecturing consist of encourage active participation, utilize multimedia and advanced technology Encourage teamwork and peer learning, give practical illustrations and applications, provide formative evaluations, develop a conducive learning environment, individualize educational experiences, Provide clear objectives and outcomes in learning process.
Y. Steinert and L. S. Snell, “Interactive lecturing: Strategies for increasing participation in large group presentations,” Med. Teach., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 1999, doi: 10.1080/01421599980011.
N. A. Alaagib, O. A. Musa, and A. M. Saeed, “Comparison of the effectiveness of lectures based on problems and traditional lectures in physiology teaching in Sudan,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1799-0.
J. Jang, J. Stecklein, and W, “Less Talk but Better Teacher Feedback,” deas Tech. to Enhanc. your Sci. Teach. Less, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2004.
E. Abdel Meguid and M. Collins, “Students’ perceptions of lecturing approaches: Traditional versus interactive teaching,” Adv. Med. Educ. Pract., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 229–241, 2022, doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S131851.
S. Kennewell, H. Tanner, S. Jones, and G. Beauchamp, “Analysing the use of interactive technology to implement interactive teaching: Original article,” J. Comput. Assist. Learn., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 61–73, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00244.x.
E. R. Kahu and K. Nelson, “Student engagement in the educational interface?: understanding the mechanisms of student success Student engagement in the educational interface?:,” High. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1–14, 2017, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197.
M. M. Ibrahim and M. Nat, “Blended learning motivation model for instructors in higher education institutions,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2019, doi: 10.1186/s41239-019-0145-2.
R. J. Yinger, “Examining thought in action: A theoretical and methodological critique of research on interactive teaching,” Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 263–282, 1986, doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(86)80007-5.
A. Xhemajli, “The role of the teacher in interactive teaching,” Int. J. Cogn. Res. Sci. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2016, doi: 10.5937/IJCRSEE1601031X.
T. A. Kleven, “Scandinavian Journal of Educational Interactive Teacher Decision ? making — still a basic skill??,” Scand. J. Educ. Res., vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 37–41, 2014, doi: 10.1080/0031383910350404.
H. J. Choi and S. D. Johnson, “The Effect of Context-Based Video Instruction on Learning and Motivation in Online Courses,” Int. J. Phytoremediation, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 215–227, 2005, doi: 10.1207/s15389286ajde1904_3.
Q. Jian, “Effects of digital flipped classroom teaching method integrated cooperative learning model on learning motivation and outcome,” Electron. Libr., vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 842–859, 2019, doi: 10.1108/EL-02-2019-0024.
M. M. Asad, N. Hussain, and M. Wadho, “Integration of e-learning technologies for interactive teaching and learning process?: an empirical study on higher education institutes of Pakistan,” J. Appl. Res. High. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0103.
P. Redmond, L. A. Abawi, A. Brown, R. Henderson, and A. Heffernan, “An online engagement framework for higher education,” Online Learn. J., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 183–204, 2018, doi: 10.24059/olj.v22i1.1175.
L. Mebert et al., “Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions,” High. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 30–51, 2020, doi: 10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306.
Z. Yu, “Sustaining Student Roles, Digital Literacy, Learning Achievements, and Motivation in Online Learning Environments during the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Sustain., vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1–14, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14084388.
Nurhayati, Jamaris, and Sufyarma Marsidin, “Strengthening Pancasila Student Profiles In Independent Learning Curriculum In Elementary School,” Int. J. Humanit. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 976–988, 2022, doi: 10.55227/ijhess.v1i6.183.
R. Bing-you, K. Varaklis, V. Hayes, R. Trowbridge, H. Kemp, and D. Mckelvy, “The Feedback Tango?: An Integrative Review and Analysis of the Content of the Teacher – Learner Feedback Exchange,” Am. Med. Coll., vol. XX, no. X, pp. 1–7, 2016, doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001927.
O. M. Asiyah and M. F. Jazuli, “Inovasi Pembelajaran PAI Abad 21,” Ta’limDiniyah J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 170–182, 2022, [Online]. Available: http://tdjpai.iaiq.ac.id/index.php/pai/article/view/33
I. Jivet, J. Wong, M. Scheffel, M. Valle Torre, M. Specht, and H. Drachsler, “Quantum of choice: How learners’ feedback monitoring decisions, goals and self-regulated learning skills are related,” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 416–427, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1145/3448139.3448179.
Z. Trinova, D. Amir, and P. Andayani, “The Implementation Of Critical ThinkinTrinova, Z., Amir, D., & Andayani, P. (2020). The Implementation Of Critical Thinking In 21ST Century Learning For Islamic Education.,” FITRAHJurnal Kaji. Ilmu-ilmu Keislam., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2020.
Tanwir, “Dasar-Dasar dan Ruang Lingkup Evaluasi Pendidikan,” J. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 56–57, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/alislah/article/view/490
D. Stufflebeam, “Evaluation models,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 2001, no. 89, pp. 7–98, 2001, doi: 10.1002/ev.3.
C. Cucus, Theory and Methodologz of Evaluation., 7th ed. Ovando: polirom publushing house, 2008.
W. Widiyastuti, “Evaluasi Sistem Pembelajaran: Telaah Landasan Filosofis Evaluasi Pembelajaran Di Stain Kudus,” Edukasia J. Penelit. Pendidik. Islam, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 237–252, 2014, doi: 10.21043/edukasia.v9i2.774.
M. Mukhlason, J. Tarbiyah, S. Tinggi, A. Islam, and P. Bangil, “KURIKULUM MATAKULIAH TEKNOLOGI PEMBELAJARAN PAI BEBASIS KKNI YANG BERORIENTASI PADA MERDEKA BELAJAR KAMPUS MERDEKA,” ejournal.kopertais4.or.id, vol. 17, no. 2, 2022, Accessed: Oct. 05, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.kopertais4.or.id/tapalkuda/index.php/pwahana/article/view/4752
M. E. Muttaqin, “Evaluasi Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam,” Pros. Nas., 2020, [Online]. Available: http://iainkediri.ac.id/prosiding/index.php/pascasarjana/article/view/49
A. J. Love, “Understanding Approaches to Evaluation,” Int. Encycl. Educ., pp. 798–807, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01594-3.
I. Drew, “Reading in the second language classroom: Consideration of first language approaches in second language contexts,” Acta Didact. Norge, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 10, May 2018, doi: 10.5617/ADNO.5570.
S. Wiyudo, “The Effectiveness of Group Discussion on Students’ Speaking Skill,” Thesis UIN Syrarif Hidayatullah, pp. 1–99, 2016.
S. Ningsi, B. Amin, and M. A. Muhsin, “THE USE OF SMALL GROUP DISCUSSION IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL,” vol. 2, no. 4, 2021.
S. Kaur, M. Bir, D. S. Chandran, and K. K. Deepak, “Adaptive strategies to conduct participant-centric structured virtual group discussions for postgraduate students in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic,” Adv. Physiol. Educ., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 150–157, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1152/ADVAN.00136.2020.
N. M. S. Wati, “Desain Pembelajaran Perkalian Bilangan Cacah dengan Equal grouph Menggunakan Alat Peraga Dakon Bagi Siswa Kelas II SD Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Matemarika,” Suluh Pendidik., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 59–70, 2019.
N. O. Yakovleva and E. V Yakovlev, “Interactive teaching methods in contemporary higher education,” Pacific Sci. Rev., vol. 1, no. September, pp. 6–11, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.pscr.2014.08.016.
McGuinness, S., Bates, J., Roulston, S., O’Connor, U., Quinn, C., & Waring, B. (2018). Empowering School Principals to Overcome Turbulence in School Partnerships through Governance Systems for Equity, Renewal and Peace: Northern Ireland. In A. Taysum & K. Arar (Eds.), Turbulence, Empowerment and Marginalisation in International Education Governance Systems (pp. 137–157). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78754-675-220181008
Merenkov, A. V., Antonova, N. L., & Popova, N. G. (2019). Leadership Potential of Professional Teacher Associations in Russia: Formation of Middle Leaders. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.9934
Milosz, M., Milosz, E., & Montusiewicz, J. (2020). Determination of ceramic tile colour surface areas on the medieval Sher-Dor Madrasah mosaic in Samarkand – Problems and solutions. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 16, e00134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2020.e00134
Muhamad, A. D., & Othman, M. R. (2020). PENGISLAHAN SISTEM PENDIDIKAN ISLAM DI TANAH MELAYU: PERANAN MUDIR MADRASAH AL-MASHOOR AL-ISLAMIAH PULAU PINANG, 1916-1957. Journal of Al-Tamaddun, 15. https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol15no1.9
O. Arop, F., F. Mbon, U., E. Ekanem, E., E. Ukpabio, G., S. Uko, E., & E. Okon, J. (2020). School Management Practices, Teachers Effectiveness, and Students’ Academic Performance in Mathematics in Secondary Schools of Cross River State, Nigeria. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters, 8(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.73.2020.83.298.309
Odinokaya, M., Krepkaia, T., Sheredekina, O., & Bernavskaya, M. (2019). The Culture of Professional Self-Realization as a Fundamental Factor of Students’ Internet Communication in the Modern Educational Environment of Higher Education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030187
Paoletti, M. E., Haut, J. M., Plaza, J., & Plaza, A. (2019). Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 158, 279–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.09.006
Park, Y., Depeursinge, C., & Popescu, G. (2018). Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine. Nature Photonics, 12(10), 578–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0253-x
Pike Lacy, A. M., Eason, C. M., Stearns, R. L., & Casa, D. J. (2021). Secondary School Administrators’ Knowledge and Perceptions of the Athletic Training Profession, Part II: Specific Considerations for Principals. Journal of Athletic Training, 56(9), 1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.4085/55-20
Reed, G. M., First, M. B., Kogan, C. S., Hyman, S. E., Gureje, O., Gaebel, W., Maj, M., Stein, D. J., Maercker, A., Tyrer, P., Claudino, A., Garralda, E., Salvador?Carulla, L., Ray, R., Saunders, J. B., Dua, T., Poznyak, V., Medina?Mora, M. E., Pike, K. M., … Saxena, S. (2019). Innovations and changes in the ICD?11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders. World Psychiatry, 18(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20611
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Schneider, S., & Pilz, M. (2019). The function and institutional embeddedness of Polytechnics in the Indian education system. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6(3), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.6.3.5
Silva, A. B., Bastos, A. S., Justino, C. I. L., da Costa, J. P., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha-Santos, T. A. P. (2018). Microplastics in the environment: Challenges in analytical chemistry - A review. Analytica Chimica Acta, 1017, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.02.043
State Hermitage Museum, & Sadofeev, D. V. (2022). “Kizhe”: On the name of the Madrasah’s Founder in Staryi Krym. Golden Horde Review, 10(2), 414–425. https://doi.org/10.22378/2313-6197.2022-10-2.414-425
Uerz, D., Volman, M., & Kral, M. (2018). Teacher educators’ competences in fostering student teachers’ proficiency in teaching and learning with technology: An overview of relevant research literature. Teaching and Teacher Education, 70, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.11.005
Y?lmaz, G., & B?kmaz, F. (2021). Revealing the professional learning needs of teachers for the successful mentoring of teacher candidates. European Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 538–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1777978
Copyright (c) 2023 Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
